A Call for Manners in the World of Blogs.
The conversational free-for-all on the Internet known as the blogosphere can be a prickly and unpleasant place. Now, a few high-profile figures in high-tech are proposing a blogger code of conduct to clean up the quality of online discourse.
I love a paragraph so loaded with irony. That's why I love a paragraph like this one.
Irony 1. I love a mainstream media icon like The NY Times pointing down its nose at the blogosphere and calling it a prickly and unpleasant place. You mean as opposed to your articles and columns or the replies they stir? Or as opposed to our national discourse, using any media, on politics, race, religion, sports, foreign policy, economics, health care, taxation, women's rights, abortion, child-care, etc, etc.
For an institution that depends on free speech the resulting prickly unpleasant and unpleasant places that result from The NY Times, etal, enjoying that right and its exercise to create its readership and revenues...it's a bit of a chuckle to read that designation.
Irony 2. I love the irony of bloggers who've howled in the past for free speech and authentic speech, who've shouted of the power of blogs is in its immediacy and reach in sharing ANYONE's thoughts...who testify to the power of blogs in bringing creativity and community and power and that its power arises from its being freed from the shackles of institutional control, ....and to sing about the power of the blogging community to self-censor by voting with their feet and eyeballs and ears as to which content they find the most valuable....to now see them be the same ones to designate themselves as the purveyors of all that is right and acceptable, much like main stream institutions have done, always for a good purpose...never for a self-serving purpose...with badges of approval indicating that person's one of us and with its lack that person is not one of us....
As an adult I don't see myself needing a 3rd party to designate for me whose opinions are acceptable. It's a bit patronizing and parental for someone to volunteer to be the FCC of the blogosphere.
Before we go any farther...I'm not talking about verbal or written threats of violence. There are laws on the books to address those issues.
But...I remember reading on a blog where you know you're saying something when people disagree. You know you're creating passionate fans when you do something amazing and do it consistently so no one can assign it to mere luck. Using a sports metaphor, the first time a team wins we all celebrate their achievement and pat the underdog on the back...And as they win again and again, they become a dynasty, and people turn on them...and the attack websites now go up and the commentators couch their prickly and unpleasant commentary in oh-so-professional terms.
It's our nature as a country that we love the underdog and love to take down the king.
It's the nature of free-speech that it allows unbridled passion. Sometimes it's ugly to see. It's ugly to read. It's ugly to hear. And these days, it's ugly to see much of the time in our country as the discourse has taken on such an aggressive, attacking tone as the level of fear is exploited.
MOST of the times...it's a wonderful event. One we all enjoy.
But it's a VERY slippery slope to begin to designate who's acceptable and part of the clubhouse and who's not. And it's so sadly ironic that bloggers would want to assume that mantle of power, approving or disapproving parts of the conversation.
And it would be sad to throw away A. free speech and B. the power of a resource like blogs because of a recent dustup of incredibly horrible behavior of an incredibly small minority of people on the 'net.
It's tough when you're getting reamed by gossip and hearsay and twisted facts. You know you've done right. And there are those whose jealousy and anger and self-esteem issues twist some material for their agenda.
Putting a cute little label on a blog isn't going to change this part of our nature as humans.
The self-correcting part of this open dialogue is that over time...people are smart enough and bright enough to essentially see the true nature of a person's words, spoken or written, and actions. Free and open communication allows that to process to take place much sooner, much more efficiently. In essence, a person can hang themselves with their own vitriol much sooner with an open conversation.
So, back to the topic at hand. Let the police deal with illegal activities. Let each of us choose what we want to read, when we want to read it. The inherent self-policing element of this approach has served to create a powerful resource like blogs, unleash an unbelievable torrent of creativity with the unfettered internet and the resources that have been developed. And as we do with TV and radio and print...we can turn the channel when our senses are offended.